Acer XB280HK 4K G-SYNC Monitor Review
by Chris Heinonen & Jarred Walton on January 28, 2015 10:00 AM ESTAcer XB280HK: Input Lag, Gamut, and Power Use
Like the other G-SYNC displays I have tested, the Acer 4K has no inputs aside from a single DisplayPort. Because I have no CRT monitor that can run at the same native resolution as it, nor a DisplayPort compatible lag tester, I can’t produce an accurate input lag measurement for the display. Obviously this is not an ideal result for a gaming display, but any number I could produce I would have zero faith in.
Color gamut shows just under 70% of the AdobeRGB color space, or a bit short of the sRGB gamut. As we saw that red is a bit under-saturated when looking at the CIE diagram, this result comes as no surprise. It’s very close so it won’t be really noticeable, and you likely won’t use the Acer for serious image editing anyway.
With the backlight at maximum on a solid white screen, the Acer consumes 49 watts of power. Set the backlight down to minimum and that falls to only 22 watts. This is well below the other 4K displays we have tested, though those all use IPS panels instead of TN. It also shows that the G-SYNC hardware, at least on these static tests, does not seem to consume a lot of extra power compared to a regular display.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
69 Comments
View All Comments
DigitalFreak - Wednesday, January 28, 2015 - link
This is why I ended up with a 21:9, 3440x1440 monitor. It's more expensive, but you can run with 100% scaling, and use 1440p resolution for games that don't support 21:9. I can also hit 60fps easily with GTX 980 SLI with all options maxed. No G-Sync, but I don't like being locked into a GPU vendor when I only replace my monitor every 5 years or so.keatre - Wednesday, January 28, 2015 - link
Also looking into the 3440x1440 spectrum. Out of curiosity, which monitor did you go with?Mondozai - Wednesday, January 28, 2015 - link
Acer is coming out with a 34" 144 Hz ultra-wide 1440p monitor with G-Sync. So that could be an alternative.Mondozai - Wednesday, January 28, 2015 - link
Oh and LG have their 34UM67 model, a Freesync IPS 1440p ultrawide 34" monitor. It's going to cost about 500 dollars or so, so the prices are coming down fast.JarredWalton - Wednesday, January 28, 2015 - link
$500 -- you have a source for that? If they get IPS 3440x1440 34" for that price, I'll be extremely surprised. After all, their non-FreeSync option currently costs over $900:http://www.amazon.com/LG-Electronics-34UM95-34-Inc...
jackstar7 - Wednesday, January 28, 2015 - link
Need to jump in and say there are zero confirmed 3440x1440 Freesync of Gsync monitors. There are rumors, but that is all.Right now, the best 3440x1440 appear to be the curved Dell and LG, but I'm also waiting to read more testing of the AOC non-curved and the Samsung curved.
JarredWalton - Wednesday, January 28, 2015 - link
AMD had an LG at CES... however I think it may have been 2560x1080.jackstar7 - Wednesday, January 28, 2015 - link
Indeed it was only 1080.People are taking a couple "stories" about new models where the authors are writing that they "believe" the monitors will have 3440x1440 and running with that "belief". Facts are thus far not present.
Black Obsidian - Thursday, January 29, 2015 - link
Unless something's changed in the last few days, there's no official confirmation of the 34UM67 being 1440p.To the contrary, given that the 34UM65 is *1080p* (while the 34UM95 & 34UM97 are 1440p), unfortunately there's good reason to believe that the 34UM67 will be 1080p Freesync.
Black Obsidian - Thursday, January 29, 2015 - link
Oh, and if the 34UM67 is indeed 1080p, that would make a ~$500 price tag more reasonable. The 34UM9x 1440p parts are still north of $900, but the 1080p 34UM65 can regularly be found much closer to that $500 mark.