Device Features and Characteristics

Prior to looking at the usage characteristics of the various drives, it is helpful to compare their specifications and also take a look at the internals. All the 1GBps-class drives discussed in this review adopt the strategy of placing a NVMe SSD controller behind a USB 3.2 Gen 2 bridge chip.

1GBps-Class Direct-Attached Storage Characteristics
Aspect
Upstream Port USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C
Bridge / Controller ASMedia ASM2362 + Innogrit IG5208 JMicron JMS583 + HP H8098 (Silicon Motion SM2263EN)
Flash Micron 64L 3D TLC Micron 64L 3D TLC
Power Bus Powered Bus Powered
     
Physical Dimensions 72.7 mm x 44 mm x 12.2 mm 65 mm x 92 mm x 9.2 mm
IP Rating IP68 N/A
Weight 40 grams (without cable) 58 grams (without cable)
Cable 20 cm USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C to Type-C
20 cm USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C to Type-A
20 cm USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C to Type-A
Type-A to Type-C Adaptor
     
S.M.A.R.T Passthrough Yes Yes
UASP Support Yes Yes
TRIM Passthrough Yes Yes

The ADATA SE800 is the lightest of the lot, coming in at 40g, compared to the 95g of the SE760 model (which integrates a separate M.2 SSD). The HP P700 is similar to the ADATA SE800, Lexar SL100 Pro, and the Samsung T7 Touch in integrating the flash, SSD controller, and the USB bridge on the same board. This enables the HP P700 to come in at 58g, similar to that of the Samsung T7 Touch. The ADATA SE800 uses an InnoGrit IG5208 SSD controller behind the ASMedia ASM2362 bridge. The HP P700 and ADATA SE760 both use the JMicron JM583 bridge, though the controllers are different - a rebranded Silicon Motion SM2263EN for the former and the Realtek RTS5763DL for the latter. The cable lengths for all the new SSDs being covered today are the same - 20cm. Interestingly, HP provides a Type-C to Type-A cable, and a Type-C to Type-A adaptor, while the usual trend is to pack a single Type-C to Type-C cable and a Type-C to Type-A adaptor. The ADATA SE800 stands out for its ruggedness with an IP68 rating. Other than the SanDisk Extreme Pro with its IP55 rating, none of the other SSDs in the above list claim any sort of ingress protection.

Two of the 500MBps-class devices being considered today use the JMicro JMS580 bridge and a Silicon Motion SM2259XT (DRAM-less) SSD controller for the SATA side of things. The HP P600 uses a rebranded version of the controller. All three use Micron's 64L 3D TLC flash. The HP P500 uses a USB flash controller (again, a Silicon Motion die in a rebranded package).

500MBps-Class Direct-Attached Storage Characteristics
Aspect
Upstream Port USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-C USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-C
Bridge / Controller JMicron JMS580 + Silicon Motion SM2259XT JMicron JMS580 + HP H6158 (Silicon Motion SM2259XT?)
Flash Micron 64L 3D TLC Micron 64L 3D TLC
Power Bus Powered Bus Powered
     
Physical Dimensions 86.7 mm x 61 mm x 10 mm 65 mm x 92 mm x 9.2 mm
IP Rating N/A N/A
Weight 35 grams (without cable) 58 grams (without cable)
Cable 20 cm USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C to Type-C
20 cm USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C to Type-A
20 cm USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C to Type-A
Type-A to Type-C Adaptor
     
S.M.A.R.T Passthrough Yes Yes
UASP Support Yes Yes
TRIM Passthrough Yes Yes

The ADATA SC680 is the lightest, coming in at 25g. The HP P500 and P600 both have a more sturdy look and feel. The cables are similar to the ones supplied with the vendor's 1GBps-class drives. The key aspect in the above table is the absence of S.M.A.R.T passthrough, TRIM support, and UASP support in the USB flash controller-based HP Portable SSD P500.

Additional details for each of the devices above, along with teardown photographs, are available in the sub-sections below.

ADATA SE800

The differentiating aspect of the ADATA SE800 is its IP68 rating and MIL-STD-810G - 516.6 shock-proofing certification. ADATA has reused the case design from the SE730 (2016 family) for the SE800. The gallery below presents some of the teardown pictures of the SE800.

There are four flash packages (two on either side) on the board. The InnoGrit 5208 (Shasta) is a PCIe 3.0 x2 DRAM-less SSD controller, and it interfaces with the flash packages on one side and an ASMedia ASM2362 USB 3.1 Gen 2 bridge on the other side. ADATA claims speeds of up to 1000 MBps for the SE800.

The internals also show two haphazardly placed thermal pads - one atop the ASMedia bridge, and another on one side of one of the ADATA flash packages. As we shall see further down, the thermal behavior of the internal board leaves a lot to be desired.

ADATA SE760

ADATA introduced the SE760 a few months after the launch of the SE800. It is a run of the mill USB 3.2 Gen 2 NVMe SSD, using separate boards for the bridge chip and the SSD, with the latter being a standard M.2 2280 NVMe SSD. The XPG SX6000 Lite used in the SE760 is a DRAM-less entry-level SSD. Unlike the SE800, the SE760 doesn't have any ingress protection, but the industrial design is sleek and attractive. The gallery below presents some of the teardown pictures of the SE760.

There are four Micron flash packages on the SX6000 Lite along with the Realtek RTS5763DL SSD controller. board. The controller is a mainstream DRAM-less offering from Realtek. The SSD interfaces with a JMicron JMS583 bridge on the main board. ADATA claims speeds of up to 1000 MBps for the SE760.

The internals show a single thermal pad on the main board. Interestingly, the only pad interfaces with empty areas of the PCB on both the main as well as the SSD gum-stick. It is evident that the thermal solution is at the wrong place, and as we shall see further down, the temperature of the board components are not pleasant when the device is subject to stressful traffic.

ADATA SC680

The SC680 is ADATA's entry level offering in the external SSD market. The slimness and lightweight nature are touted by ADATA as selling points for the drive. It integrates a SATA SSD and a USB bridge on a single PCB. The gallery below presents some of the teardown pictures of the SC680.

There are four flash packages (two on each side of the board). The controller used is the DRAM-less Silicon Motion SM2259XT, with the JMicron JMS580 doing the bridge duties. ADATA claims speeds of up to 530 MBps for the SC680.

There is no thermal solution to speak of, and the performance profile of the device leads us to believe that one might not be strictly necessary. The plastic casing ensures that any generated heat doesn't really surprise the user while handling the device.

HP P700

The P700 is HP's flagship offering in the USB external storage space. The uniqueness of the P700 (as well as the P600 discussed below) lies in its cable management design. A magnetic casing (with dimensions similar to that of the main drive) is supplied to store the cable and adaptor along with the drive itself. It is strong enough for carrying around both the drive and the cable casing together, while also being easy enough to separate for actual usage. The other interesting aspect is the adaptor - while vendors have typically provided Type-C to Type-C cables, along with a Type-C to Type-A adaptor (most Type-C to Type-A adaptors are not legitimate as per USB-IF specifications), HP supplies a Type-C to Type-A cable, along with a Type-A to Type-C adaptor. The P700 integrates a NVMe SSD and a USB bridge on a single PCB. The gallery below presents some of the teardown pictures of the P700.

There are two flash packages, Micron-branded DRAM, and a HP H8098 (re-branded Silicon Motion controller) on one side of the board. The other side is practically empty (with the blank flash package slots potentially being used in higher-capacity versions).The JMicron JMS583 performs the bridging duties. HP claims speeds of up to 1000 MBps for the P700.

A thermal pad is affixed to the inner side of the metal casing and interfaces with the flash packages as well as the SSD controller. Based on this thermal solution, we do not expect any surprises in our thermal stress tests described further down.

HP P600

The P600 targets the same market segment as that of the ADATA SC680. Similar to the SC680, it also adopts a single-PCB design for a DRAM-less SATA SSD behind a USB bridge. In terms of external appearance, it is quite similar to the P700 as can be seen from the teardown pictures below.

There are four flash packages on one side of the board. The controller used is the DRAM-less HP H6158 (re-branded Silicon Motion SM2259XT, in all likelihood), with the JMicron JMS580 doing the bridge duties. HP claims speeds of up to 560 MBps for the P600.

There are two strategically placed thermal pads attempting to cover all flash packages as well as the SSD controller. At first glance, considering the performance profile of the device, this looks acceptable. Nevertheless, the real-world performance of this thermal solution is worthy of the additional investigation reported in a later section.

HP P500

The P500 is an entry-level portable SSD with an industrial design reminiscent of the Samsung T1 from 2015. It doesn't come with magnetic cable-holder, but the cable/adaptor combination supplied alongwith is the same as the ones for the P600 and P700. The internal reveal a single-PCB design with a USB flash controller and a separate and a Type-C switch. The gallery below presents some of the teardown pictures for the P500.

There are four flash packages on one side of the board. The controller used is the HP H3808 (re-branded Silicon Motion SM3280), with the EtronTech EJ179V for implementing the Type-C support. HP claims speeds of up to 370 MBps for the P500.

There is no thermal solution necessary for this performance profile. The usage of a USB flash controller also precludes the collection of interesting device characteristics during the course of usage. It is interesting to see HP utilize a USB flash drive controller in a device marketed as a portable SSD.

Introduction Synthetic Benchmarks - ATTO and CrystalDiskMark
Comments Locked

13 Comments

View All Comments

  • mark625 - Thursday, September 24, 2020 - link

    Is it just me, or is the color you chose for the temperature line in the graphs on the last page actually "transparent"? All I can see is the throughput line (in blue) and the starting and ending temperatures (in red). There is no graph line for temperature.
  • ganeshts - Thursday, September 24, 2020 - link

    The lead-up text to the graph explicitly states: " the temperature of the drive was also recorded at the beginning and end of the processing. In earlier reviews, we used to track the temperature all through. However, we have observed that SMART read-outs for the temperature in NVMe SSDs using USB 3.2 Gen 2 bridge chips end up negatively affecting the actual transfer rates. To avoid this problem, we have restricted ourselves to recording the temperature at either end of the actual workloads set."

    Additionally, temperatures are not available for drives that do not support the read-out (example: HP P500)
  • Alistair - Thursday, September 24, 2020 - link

    I've never had an external drive as bad as the Adata SC680. Stay away. Unless you like 20MB/s after it quickly uses its cache and overheats. Faster to do a backup with a spinning drive. Go higher end for sure. The SE800 or HP etc.
  • AMDSuperFan - Thursday, September 24, 2020 - link

    I would like to see them compared to PCIE 4.0 drives. This article is incomplete. Also please put time in seconds. I would like to know how many seconds boot takes, not a random number that means very little.
  • ganeshts - Thursday, September 24, 2020 - link

    Please tell me which PCIe 4.0 drive is available as an external SSD.

    The time in seconds for boot will also have the same relative difference as the MBps rating. Higher the 'random' number, the faster would be the boot time on an ideal system where the *storage* is the bottleneck. PCMark 10 actually replays the storage trace for the process, rather than doing the actual booting. So, any 'time' obtained from a trace replay *may* not correspond to the *actual* boot time on a system.
  • AMDSuperFan - Thursday, September 24, 2020 - link

    Correct. However I would like to know the specifics. If I buy this fast drive. How fast will it go? Knowing the speed in seconds is 0-60. Knowing the MBps rating is knowing the top speed. They don't always mean the same thing. Do I upgrade to one of these from my PCIE4 drive in my AMD computer?
  • Billy Tallis - Thursday, September 24, 2020 - link

    "Do I upgrade to one of these from my PCIE4 drive in my AMD computer?"

    Please stop with the stupid trolling comments.
  • Luminar - Friday, September 25, 2020 - link

    Ouch
  • Shmee - Friday, September 25, 2020 - link

    Interesting, it still seems to me it makes more sense to get a good m.2 or 2.5in drive with an enclosure. Could be faster AND cheaper.
  • jabber - Friday, September 25, 2020 - link

    Would be handy to see how a 'Amazon homebrew special' would hold up price and performance wise in comparison. it's the route i would take. Just more flexible.

    However, in any real world scenario these things will all crawl to KBps speeds as soon as they hit microfiles which are the Achilles heel of modern data systems. We need better file systems to compensate.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now