AT reviewing a GPU? That hasn't been a thing since January of 2020 or so. This was the last GPU review they did that I was able to find in a cursory search of the GPU section:
I wouldn't suggest holding your breath for anything like that. AT GPU news is mainly product press releases and whatnot. Actual hands-on with hardware...meh, maybe someday? I have doubts though.
Intel missed a huge opportunity by skipping out on 24GB/32GB Arcs.
I dunno if the chip actually supports that config, but there is a huge group of ML/workstation users that need every byte of VRAM they can get more than they need the compute power of a 3090/4090. And Intel has no high end pro market to lose.
84GB for $1225 sounds downright reasonable, I'm glad Intel is taking the VRAM size disruptor role since that makes sense as their easy first target with Nvidia being so stingy or costly on RAM.
We’ve updated our terms. By continuing to use the site and/or by logging into your account, you agree to the Site’s updated Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
8 Comments
Back to Article
tipoo - Wednesday, June 7, 2023 - link
Time for an AT overview of how well these work as pro offeringsPeachNCream - Wednesday, June 7, 2023 - link
AT reviewing a GPU? That hasn't been a thing since January of 2020 or so. This was the last GPU review they did that I was able to find in a cursory search of the GPU section:https://www.anandtech.com/show/15422/the-amd-radeo...
I wouldn't suggest holding your breath for anything like that. AT GPU news is mainly product press releases and whatnot. Actual hands-on with hardware...meh, maybe someday? I have doubts though.
lemurbutton - Thursday, June 8, 2023 - link
Ryan Smith is too busy twitting. He doesn't have time to review a GPU or the M1/M2 Ultra.brucethemoose - Wednesday, June 7, 2023 - link
Intel missed a huge opportunity by skipping out on 24GB/32GB Arcs.I dunno if the chip actually supports that config, but there is a huge group of ML/workstation users that need every byte of VRAM they can get more than they need the compute power of a 3090/4090. And Intel has no high end pro market to lose.
tipoo - Wednesday, June 7, 2023 - link
84GB for $1225 sounds downright reasonable, I'm glad Intel is taking the VRAM size disruptor role since that makes sense as their easy first target with Nvidia being so stingy or costly on RAM.brucethemoose - Wednesday, June 7, 2023 - link
???Igor_Kavinski - Thursday, June 8, 2023 - link
Source?Eletriarnation - Thursday, June 8, 2023 - link
Seems like a sentence got cut off here?: "This is a notable development as,"