Mobile Buyer's Guide

by Jarred Walton on July 11, 2008 12:00 AM EST

High-End Laptops

High-end computer components are typically a case of diminishing returns, and laptops are not different. You can get pretty much everything you need in a laptop for under $2000 with no difficulty; getting that last 20% performance boost - whether it be in CPU power, graphics power, battery life, or just plain style - can be expensive. Here is where you'll find such upgrades as the Core 2 Extreme X9000, 8800M GTX (perhaps two!), Blu-ray, and solid state hard drives.

For maximum battery life and improved performance, you'll want a smaller laptop with an SSD. A 32GB SSD on its own will set you back around $400, or $800 for the 64GB drives. You can purchase the SSD separately for a potential savings, though some vendors have close ties with memory companies that allow them to pre-install the drive at a discount. A quick survey of the online resellers leads us to the Samsung SSDs as some of the best price/performance/reliability options. The 32GB MCBQE32G5MPP-0VA00 and 64GB MCCOE64G5MPP-0VA00 both boast 100MB/s sequential read and 80MB/s sequential write speeds, with random read/write speeds of 80/30MBps. Take any of the 12.1" midrange notebooks, add a 64GB SSD, and you have a high-end laptop. Or you can grab something like the ASUS U2E-A2B for $2700 and get an even smaller laptop. Just be forewarned that many of these ultraportables sacrifice a lot of performance to extend battery life.


Gaming options for high-end notebooks come in a variety of flavors. Besides upgraded versions of midrange offerings, there are numerous companies selling systems based on the Clevo M570RU that comes with an 8800M GTX. We first saw this particular notebook early this year with the WidowPC Sting 517D2, and then we looked at a modified configuration a bit later with the AVADirect M570RU. Given they both use the same design, we're inclined to go with whoever offers the better price, and of all the Clevo M570RU options we've seen the least expensive happens to be AVADirect. The fact that they offer a ton of component choices doesn't hurt either.

One gaming option that we'd steer clear of in this price range is the 8700M GT SLI laptops. SLI might sound like a nice feature, but a single 8800M GTS will generally outperform 8700M SLI, and with the Gateway FX laptops costing far less there's no point in SLI unless you're going with dual 8800M. With prices starting at upwards of $3000, we'll save them for the Dream category.

If gaming isn't your major concern but you want a lot of number crunching power, you can go one of two ways. Option one is to get a notebook with an X9000 processor. The CPU alone will set you back over $1000 on its own, so take the midrange options from the last page and if they can support the X9000 you've got a powerful number cruncher. The other alternative that can get you even more processing power is to purchase a notebook that supports desktop processors and drop in a higher end dual-core or even a quad-core CPU. We're not aware of any laptops that will officially support anything above a Q9550, but at 2.83GHz that will already easily surpass the X9000. Desktop CPUs pretty much guarantee that you'll be lugging around a 17" or larger notebook, but the X9000 is still quite demanding and is not likely to be found in anything smaller than a 15.4" chassis. However, unless you demand every last ounce of performance, we'd recommend against either choice and instead stick with a T9500 (2.6GHz) or T9300 (2.5GHz) - which you can find in 14.1" laptops.


We've mentioned Apple several times already, but they always seem to cost a bit too much for the performance and features on tap. Sure, you get all the OSX goodness that so many seem to like, and you can run both OSX and Windows. Not that you can't do that with an appropriate hackintosh, but I digress…. The MacBook Pro has a lot of great features, like the LED backlighting on the LCD and keyboard. The base $2000 model also includes a T8300, 2GB RAM, 200GB HDD, and 8600M GT 256MB. An extra $500 will get you a T9300, 250GB HDD, and a 512MB 8600M GT, and there's also the 17" MacBook Pro, which gives you a larger 1680x1050 LCD for $300 more. Obviously, those are some very steep price hikes for a few minor upgrades, but there are lots of people that love the Apple "look". You could also opt for the MacBook Air, perhaps with an SSD; we have reservations about the Air, but the overall design makes for a great traveling companion.

Midrange Laptops Dream Laptops
Comments Locked

28 Comments

View All Comments

  • jmurbank - Friday, July 18, 2008 - link

    I also agree buying a notebook should be based on quality, battery, screen or size. The so called guide is more like a price comparison than a real guide. A real guide will tell the reader to ask themselves questions what they need in the notebook or what they are going to use the notebook for in a certain environment.

    If the guide is realistically, budget notebooks can rise up to high-end prices after including extras. Let us see, my Dell Inspiron 1520 costs around $1700 after including some upgrades to suit my needs. After a corporate or employee discount from a relative or friend, it made it $300 cheaper which is $1400 for the final price.

    I would say I got a good notebook computer compared to the problems I am experiencing because it gets 4 to 6 hours of battery life for general tasks in either Windows and GNU/Linux with the use of the 9 cell battery, and nVidia GeForce8 8400M GS that eases multiple monitor setup and decent 3D performance in games. The upgrade to Intel WiFi 3945 helps setting up WiFi in GNU/Linux easier. The choice of a brighter display instead of a wide-angle high resolution display also helps the battery usage last longer since I do not have to use the full brightness. The lowest brightness is bright enough to see the screen. The glossy display is a little annoying while being around bright sources such as at the airport or outside. It is hot even though I picked a T7300 processor and stuck with 2 GB of DDR2-667 memory (two modules of 1 GB).

    I would gauge my notebook quality as 3.5, portability a 7, and size a 6.

    I would not care about what matrices design that the LCD is constructed. I would care more if notebook manufactures tells us consumers the LCD screen is 6-bit or 8-bit because there is a difference in the amount of colors. One is 18-bit color while the other is 24-bit color. If you think of not seeing 16515072 colors is something not to complain about, then people have a lot to learn. Not seeing 16515072 colors is color blindness.
  • fabarati - Saturday, July 12, 2008 - link

    Ok, beginner was a bit of an overexageration. You're at an intermediate level.
  • dblevitan - Saturday, July 12, 2008 - link

    I'm surprised the only mention of Thinkpads is the x61. The T series is probably one of the most popular laptop series created and are some of the sturdiest laptops around. Sure, they're not as flashy as many laptops but they have good performance, are reliable, and just work. And they're surprisingly inexpensive.
  • Mafiacrime - Friday, July 11, 2008 - link

    http://www.mafiacrime.org/r.php?id=5320">http://www.mafiacrime.org/r.php?id=5320

    Come check out Mafia Crime!!
  • microAmp - Friday, July 11, 2008 - link

    Yay for spam!
  • SniperWulf - Friday, July 11, 2008 - link

    Or the P-6831FX for that matter?
  • JarredWalton - Friday, July 11, 2008 - link

    I suppose at 8000 words, I can't expect people to read everything. Check page 5 where I mention both (and page 3 mentions the 6831 briefly as well). I did after all give the 6831 a Gold EC award, so you can hardly expect me to forget about it. :)
  • Gast - Friday, July 11, 2008 - link

    No apple notebooks? Even if you do have to purchace Windows, I consider them a contender. Esp with their support. (Yay for 2 lightning strike iBooks replaced @ no charge).
  • microAmp - Friday, July 11, 2008 - link

    Did you skip page 6?
  • Gast - Friday, July 11, 2008 - link

    I did. And I also missed the brief mention of the MacBook in the earlier pages. Shame on me for not reading the article close enough, much less the entire article.

    The entire article does kinda gloss on warentee information, which is where I see Apple truely shining. *shrugs* Fair review I'd say though.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now