CPU Performance

Readers of our motherboard review section will have noted the trend in modern motherboards to implement a form of MultiCore Enhancement / Acceleration / Turbo (read our report here) on their motherboards. This does several things, including better benchmark results at stock settings (not entirely needed if overclocking is an end-user goal) at the expense of heat and temperature. It also gives in essence an automatic overclock which may be against what the user wants. Our testing methodology is ‘out-of-the-box’, with the latest public BIOS installed and XMP enabled, and thus subject to the whims of this feature. It is ultimately up to the motherboard manufacturer to take this risk – and manufacturers taking risks in the setup is something they do on every product (think C-state settings, USB priority, DPC Latency / monitoring priority, memory subtimings at JEDEC). Processor speed change is part of that risk, and ultimately if no overclocking is planned, some motherboards will affect how fast that shiny new processor goes and can be an important factor in the system build.

Point Calculations – 3D Movement Algorithm Test: link

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz and IPC wins in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores. For a brief explanation of the platform agnostic coding behind this benchmark, see my forum post here.

3D Particle Movement: Single Threaded

3D Particle Movement: MultiThreaded

Compression – WinRAR 5.0.1: link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30 second 720p videos.

WinRAR 5.01

Image Manipulation – FastStone Image Viewer 4.9: link

Similarly to WinRAR, the FastStone test us updated for 2014 to the latest version. FastStone is the program I use to perform quick or bulk actions on images, such as resizing, adjusting for color and cropping. In our test we take a series of 170 images in various sizes and formats and convert them all into 640x480 .gif files, maintaining the aspect ratio. FastStone does not use multithreading for this test, and thus single threaded performance is often the winner.

FastStone Image Viewer 4.9

Video Conversion – Handbrake v0.9.9: link

Handbrake is a media conversion tool that was initially designed to help DVD ISOs and Video CDs into more common video formats. The principle today is still the same, primarily as an output for H.264 + AAC/MP3 audio within an MKV container. In our test we use the same videos as in the Xilisoft test, and results are given in frames per second.

HandBrake v0.9.9 Film CPU Only

HandBrake v0.9.9 2x4K CPU Only

Rendering – PovRay 3.7: link

The Persistence of Vision RayTracer, or PovRay, is a freeware package for as the name suggests, ray tracing. It is a pure renderer, rather than modeling software, but the latest beta version contains a handy benchmark for stressing all processing threads on a platform. We have been using this test in motherboard reviews to test memory stability at various CPU speeds to good effect – if it passes the test, the IMC in the CPU is stable for a given CPU speed. As a CPU test, it runs for approximately 2-3 minutes on high end platforms.

PovRay 3.7 beta

Synthetic – 7-Zip 9.2: link

As an open source compression tool, 7-Zip is a popular tool for making sets of files easier to handle and transfer. The software offers up its own benchmark, to which we report the result.

7-Zip MIPS

System Performance Gaming Performance 2015
Comments Locked

14 Comments

View All Comments

  • hansmuff - Friday, July 24, 2015 - link

    I'm a little disappointed that the UEFI seemingly wasn't reviewed.
  • hansmuff - Friday, July 24, 2015 - link

    And yes I see "take a look at our MSI Z97 Gaming 5 review or our MSI Z97 Guard Pro review for a more detailed analysis." Has nothing at all changed?
  • Refuge - Friday, July 24, 2015 - link

    Not really sure what is confusing about.

    "nothing new from our previous analysis"

    Seems pretty clear cut and simple to me.
  • LoganPowell - Friday, November 27, 2015 - link

    Good observation! I was also personally not very impressed with it. I recommend going for the CybertronPC Patriot instead. It's extremely highly rated among users (see http://www.consumerrunner.com/top-10-best-desktops... for example...)
  • MrCommunistGen - Friday, July 24, 2015 - link

    The last paragraph of "MSI Z97A Gaming 6 Overview" on page 1 as well as the last section of page 1 "BIOS and Software" mention it.

    It is a little ambiguous whether it is identical to previous iterations, or if only minor changes have been made, but Ian does say: "The conclusions are still the same..."
  • Shadowmaster625 - Friday, July 24, 2015 - link

    One USB 3.1 port? ONE? HAAHHAHA. It looks so stupid sitting in that row all by itself. What are these guys thinking?
  • thudo - Friday, July 24, 2015 - link

    Yeah thats truely pathetic. USB3.0 dead dead D-E-A-D while 3.1 is vastly superior in all ways to that olde has-been. All the USB3.0 should have, at a minimum, been replaced with USB3.1 Type-A connectors.. For shame.. >:[
  • tabascosauz - Friday, July 24, 2015 - link

    Hahahahahah

    Or maybe there isn't space on the board for that many third party controllers? Hmmm?
  • CrazyElf - Friday, July 24, 2015 - link

    To be honest, at this price point, I'd recommend paying a bit extra to get the MSI Gaming 7. You get a better VRM (12 phase - 6 doubled), a lot better rear IO panel, and a few other features.

    I just wish this thing shipped with an Intel LAN I218V or something similar. These Killer NICs I find tend to be more trouble than they are worth. None of them hold up a candle to Intel's server grade NICs either.

    Of course, I personally prefer to get OC oriented boards like the Asrock OC Formula, Gigabyte SOC Force, or similar boards, but that's just me. To me, most of these "gaming"boards aren't too good.
  • DigitalFreak - Friday, July 24, 2015 - link

    At this point I'd wait for Skylake.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now