System Performance Cont'd

Now that we've gone over some of the more CPU-bound benchmarks for overall performance, we can look at some of the more GPU-bound benchmarks such as 3DMark, Basemark X, and GFXBench 3. Of course, it's important to note that we're actively in the process of migrating to newer GPU benchmarks so for now these benchmarks are really mostly representative of OpenGL ES 3 performance rather than 3.1.

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Overall

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Graphics

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Physics

BaseMark X 1.1 - Overall (High Quality)

BaseMark X 1.1 - Dunes (High Quality, Offscreen)

BaseMark X 1.1 - Hangar (High Quality, Offscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan (Onscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan (Offscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 T-Rex HD (Onscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 T-Rex HD (Offscreen)

Interestingly, the GPU benchmark results show a pretty noticeable change relative to what we saw out of the One M9 at the launch of the first Snapdragon 810 phones. It's clear that some sort of driver optimization has been implemented as in every benchmark we see performance improvements well north of 5% that would be seen from purely clock speed gains. This highlights just how volatile GPU performance can be as Adreno 430 is now roughly equivalent to the T760MP8 in GFXBench and 3DMark. However, we still see the Adreno 430 lagging behind in Basemark X, which suggests the architecture of the Adreno 430 is a limiting factor in some workloads.

NAND Performance

While it’s often easy to forget about internal storage outside of capacity, it turns out that good storage performance is critical for a number of general purpose computing tasks. Mobile OSes aren’t necessarily as affected by storage performance as a desktop or laptop that is caching parts of RAM on internal storage, but even so it’s definitely possible to see the problems that result from cutting too deep here. Probably the most well-known example of this sort of cutting was the original Nexus 7 in 2012, which suffered from severe issues due to a lack of TRIM and general poor performance. In order to test mobile devices for this sort of problem, we use our standard benchmarks for testing basic read and write performance of the internal storage solution. In the case of the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, we see a Samsung CGND3R eMMC package, while the Xiaomi Mi Note uses Toshiba’s 016GE2 eMMC solution.

Internal NAND - Sequential Read

Internal NAND - Sequential Write

Internal NAND - Random Read

Internal NAND - Random Write

In practice, neither has incredible performance, but performance is far from poor here. For the most part, the user experience effects on storage performance will be somewhat hard to notice as sufficient storage performance means that the bottleneck for any kind of lag or stutter would be elsewhere in most applications.

System Performance Software: MIUI 6
Comments Locked

94 Comments

View All Comments

  • HanakoIkezawa - Friday, September 11, 2015 - link

    Is the note 5 review anytime soon?
  • ddriver - Friday, September 11, 2015 - link

    What does the Mi note have to do with a "note"? Does it have a stylus? Or maybe with some other way of taking notes? What makes it a "note"?
  • lilmoe - Friday, September 11, 2015 - link

    It's basically an attempt at trolling Samsung really....
  • LoganPowell - Friday, November 27, 2015 - link

    But Samsung is the better choice compare to Xiaomi Note, in my opinion and I don't think Xiaomi Note will stand a chance to some of the really good phones that are already available (like http://www.consumerrunner.com/top-10-best-phones/ for example...)
  • mforce - Friday, September 11, 2015 - link

    It's the big one :) Chinese phone makers are calling their big phones ( 5.5 or larger ) "Note" while their others aren't really called anything, you'll have plain "Mi4"
  • HanakoIkezawa - Friday, September 11, 2015 - link

    They get to piggyback off of samsungs marketing, it's pretty standard fair for Chinese manufacturers.
  • name99 - Saturday, September 12, 2015 - link

    It's REALLY hard to feel sorry for anyone piggybacking off Samsung's marketing...
  • snarfbot - Thursday, September 17, 2015 - link

    fare
  • JoshHo - Friday, September 11, 2015 - link

    It's next.

    As a sneak peek, if you check some of the still image performance galleries... :)
  • SAAA - Monday, March 28, 2016 - link

    WE HAVE XIAOMI Mi 5 HITTING THE MARKET ON APRIL 6. LOOK OUT DETAILS

    <a href="http://http://www.upcomingmobile.com/2016/03/giaonee-mi-5... style="color: #b01a38; font-size: 11px;" target="_blank">XIAOMI Mi 5 spec</a>

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now