The GTX 780M is the top dog in the mobile GPU space right now, but our last experience with it in the MSI GT70 was a bit touch and go. It seemed like the combination of the 47W Haswell quad and the 100W 780M was really pushing the GT70 chassis to the limits of its thermal headroom, or perhaps the CPU just wasn't quite as fast as the 780M wanted. This resulted in poorer performance than the Ivy Bridge/GTX 680M combination we saw in the Alienware M17x R4 in some of the more CPU-intensive games.

Bioshock Infinite - Mainstream

Bioshock Infinite - Enthusiast

Elder Scrolls: Skyrim - Mainstream

Elder Scrolls: Skyrim - Enthusiast

GRID 2 - Mainstream

GRID 2 - Enthusiast

Metro: Last Light - Mainstream

Metro: Last Light - Enthusiast

Sleeping Dogs - Mainstream

Sleeping Dogs - Enthusiast

StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm - Mainstream

StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm - Enthusiast

Tomb Raider - Mainstream

Tomb Raider - Enthusiast

At stock clocks, the 780M has 22% more shader power than the 680M and 39% more memory bandwidth, so the expectation would be to get substantially better performance; couple that with an i7 Extreme CPU and we have a recipe for maximum performance. The P177SM chassis seems to have much higher thermal limits, so performance increases across the board relative to the GT70, but there is still a question about the M17x R4. Performance in the CPU intensive games is pretty even with the M17x, even with a definite increase in both CPU and GPU horsepower, indicating that there’s still some interesting CPU-related behavior happening under load.

Extreme Edition CPU Performance Battery Life
Comments Locked

38 Comments

View All Comments

  • Braincruser - Monday, September 2, 2013 - link

    Are there thermals? Also FIRST!
  • DigitalFreak - Monday, September 2, 2013 - link

    Is your life so pathetic that you need a "first" post?
  • Hubb1e - Monday, September 2, 2013 - link

    A lot of words about industrial design where it clearly doesn't matter to the end users. The appeal of these is choosing components. Those who do care are welcome to pay more for it. I prefer plain to gaudy any day anyway.
  • ShieTar - Monday, September 2, 2013 - link

    I second that. More specifically, "overwhelming blackness" actually sounds good to me. When I sit in a darkened room staring at my Notebook-Screen, chances are I do not want to see anything except the screen itself. Either I am watching a movie on it, or I am playing some deeply immersing game, but in any way having a colored dragon in my field of view won't usually help the experience.
  • madmilk - Monday, September 2, 2013 - link

    This isn't plain by any stretch of the imagination. Why can't Clevo just use black matte plastic consistently all around, without weird bevels, trims and LED audio meters?
  • nostriluu - Monday, September 2, 2013 - link

    This is only because the writer's comprehension of industrial design is childish.
  • asasione - Monday, September 2, 2013 - link

    Come someone from Anandtech please let me know if they are planning on reviewing the P370M/SM or P375M/SM with dual Nvidia 780M anytime in the near future
  • lololol - Monday, September 2, 2013 - link

    LOL? 32 GB RAM using Microsoft 7 Home Premium... FAIL!
  • ddriver - Monday, September 2, 2013 - link

    Upgrade to unlock kinda deal (on a better day I'd call it scam). Cheaper windows drops the price a bit but makes some of the memory you paid for inaccessible, pay extra to ms for upgrade to get it all working without hurting the margins of the laptop manufacturer.
  • rpgfool1 - Monday, September 2, 2013 - link

    Seems like the notebook I want. Looking at several Clevo resellers for the P177SM and some are getting $50 off $1350+. Lowest prices are from Pro-Star, LPC-Digital, and PowerNotebooks. Mythologic sells it the most expensive, followed by Eurocom. I know the Alienware 17 and Razer Blade Pro cost more, but the Clevo P177SM seem to have more options available.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now