Notebook Trio: ASUS A8JS and G2P and ABS Mayhem Z5
by Jarred Walton on December 29, 2006 12:15 PM EST- Posted in
- Laptops
Synthetic Graphics Performance
We don't place a lot of stock with the performance results generated by Futuremark's 3DMark applications, but they are relatively consistent and we do have comprehensive results from all of the laptops including the Dell XPS M1710. As 3DMark is typically more graphics limited than anything, we expect to see the Dell and ABS laptops perform nearly the same. That information combined with the results in our gaming benchmarks should allow us to say how much of a performance improvement people might see if they are interested in upgrading from a Core Duo system to a Core 2 Duo system, at least from a gaming perspective.
As expected, 3D performance depends almost entirely on the graphics card. The two GeForce Go 7900 GTX laptops easily surpass the performance of the ASUS notebooks, and the GeForce Go 7700 is faster than the Radeon Mobility X1700 in all but one of the tests. Oddly enough, 3DMark05 actually shows the X1700 as being slightly faster, but given the other results we wouldn't put too much faith in that number. We'll see in a moment how the systems compare in actual games. Not surprisingly, the CPU results show that the Core 2 Duo T7200 is faster than the Core Duo T2600. There are few cases where the Dell XPS places ahead of one of the Core 2 Duo laptops in CPU performance, but that is caused by the impact of the faster GPU.
We don't place a lot of stock with the performance results generated by Futuremark's 3DMark applications, but they are relatively consistent and we do have comprehensive results from all of the laptops including the Dell XPS M1710. As 3DMark is typically more graphics limited than anything, we expect to see the Dell and ABS laptops perform nearly the same. That information combined with the results in our gaming benchmarks should allow us to say how much of a performance improvement people might see if they are interested in upgrading from a Core Duo system to a Core 2 Duo system, at least from a gaming perspective.
As expected, 3D performance depends almost entirely on the graphics card. The two GeForce Go 7900 GTX laptops easily surpass the performance of the ASUS notebooks, and the GeForce Go 7700 is faster than the Radeon Mobility X1700 in all but one of the tests. Oddly enough, 3DMark05 actually shows the X1700 as being slightly faster, but given the other results we wouldn't put too much faith in that number. We'll see in a moment how the systems compare in actual games. Not surprisingly, the CPU results show that the Core 2 Duo T7200 is faster than the Core Duo T2600. There are few cases where the Dell XPS places ahead of one of the Core 2 Duo laptops in CPU performance, but that is caused by the impact of the faster GPU.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
17 Comments
View All Comments
Ajax9000 - Sunday, January 7, 2007 - link
Some of us want a highly portable computer that can can drive a big screen at home or work. For us, a 13" or 14" laptop with (say) a Go7700+DL-DVI is actually way more useful than a 17" laptop with DL-DVI. Gaming isn't a priority for us and the 17" is too big for good portability and just gets in the way when used with a big screen on a desk.tinus - Thursday, January 4, 2007 - link
Why did you not include the Asus G1 laptop in the comparison, since you dislike the gpu on the G2 laptop? I would have loved to see a comparison between the A8js and the G1, since the only difference between the two ought to be the screen (both feature a Geforce Go 7700). Especially since you say that the screen on the G2 is so much better than that on the A8Js. If nothing else, I would much appreciate any comments regarding the G1 since i am looking a replacement for my current laptop, and the G1 seems to fit me perfectly.JarredWalton - Thursday, January 4, 2007 - link
Unfortunately, ASUS sent me the G2P - as I've frequently commented, we basically review what we get. I don't know why, as the G1 seems better overall. G1 is a 15.4" though, so the display may not be as good - without seeing it in person, I can't say, although I can put in a request to ASUS to get a G1 for review if you'd like. G1 also comes with either a 1280x800 (YUCK!) LCD or a 1680x1050 (HOORAY!) LCD - but if they're both more like the A8J LCD than the G2P then it's still sort of a wash as to which is best.tinus - Friday, January 5, 2007 - link
Thanks for the reply, but no, you do not have to request the G1, because I already found a review of it on another site, and they claim that it is the same screen as on the G2.And yes, the 1680x1050 screen would be perfect!
JarredWalton - Friday, January 5, 2007 - link
It can't be the same display, as the G1 is a 15.4" LCD and the G2 is a 17" LCD. Now, if it's the same quality overall, that would be good, and hopefully that's what you meant. :)tinus - Sunday, January 7, 2007 - link
Yea well.. you understand what I wanted to say ;)customcoms - Saturday, December 30, 2006 - link
on this page: http://anandtech.com/mobile/showdoc.aspx?i=2899&am...">http://anandtech.com/mobile/showdoc.aspx?i=2899&am...there is some mislabeling of the pictures (between the Asus G2P and the A8JS). It clear that this page is talking about the G2P but the article should still be fixed!
JarredWalton - Saturday, December 30, 2006 - link
This is the second image-related complaint, and again I'm a bit confused. Page 5 is definitely showing the G2P images, at least for me. I have no idea what you're seeing that convinces you otherwise, but please check it again and if you really aren't seeing the right images take a screenshot so I can figure out what you *are* seeing. Also, information on what browser and OS you're using could be helpful.yacoub - Saturday, December 30, 2006 - link
I found this review article very worthwhile. That Asus "gaming" laptop, however, is a joke with that GPU. =(Tommyguns - Monday, January 1, 2007 - link
I agree. Very happy seeing this review done. I've been looking at getting a laptop for awhile now and waited on the C2D's. Was gonna pick one up, but for the money vs performance, I was far too disapointed with the current GPU results. It seems there are reviews for all the desktop GPU's and graphed ect... but its impossible to get a clear understanding on the laptop side. X1600 was looking good. Perhaps a mass peformance testing of most of the current GPU's?Yeah, so basicly i am just really confused on how all these chips compare. Thanks for the review!