Microsoft’s day 1 keynote for the BUILD developer conference detailed an update to Windows coming on the next scheduled patch Tuesday called 8.1 Update. Notice it’s not called Update 1, which means there may or may not be more of these updates later in the year. Hopefully there’s more.

Windows 8 launched about 18 months ago. With that launch, Windows was put on a rapid release cycle, which resulted in Windows 8.1 a mere 12 months later. When Windows 8 launched, “touch first” was the talking point used during the reveal. Windows 8 was likely the biggest ever change to Windows, and was a pretty big gamble on Microsoft’s part. For the project head of Windows 8, it didn’t work out with Steven Sinofsky leaving the company only a couple of weeks after the launch event. As a product launch, it certainly didn’t halt the decline in PC sales that were already beginning.

Much has been said of Windows 8 since its launch, some of it good, some of it bad. Most of the bad focused on how Microsoft forced a touch interface and mobile app system onto a market that was, especially at the time, dominated by non-touch PCs and devices. A lot of the criticism was valid, and was likely exaggerated due to there being no way to re-enable any legacy mode. In the history of Windows, there has always been a way to go back to the old version’s look and feel, but keep the new functionality. In the case of Windows 8, this didn’t happen, and many people don’t appreciate that.

To add extra fuel to the fire, even the touch first interface (called Modern by this point) wasn’t finished. Many settings and functionality could only be accessed by the desktop control panel which was decidedly non-touch. Even though Windows 8 was actually quite a good touch based operating system, it wasn’t finished. The design decisions of the touch based system were all based on edge gestures, but there were no obvious way to know that.

Windows 8.1 addressed a lot of the complaints. The Start Button was back – even if its functionality was not the same. The Start button could be configured to launch into the All Apps mode rather than the Start Screen of Windows 8. You could choose to boot directly to the desktop. And on the touch side, some of the gestures were changed, and many more of the PC settings could be configured from the Modern interface. As a bonus (or not – depending on who you are) everything was synced with SkyDrive, and SkyDrive was installed on both x86 and ARM versions for file sync with the cloud. The built in apps were much better, the store was overhauled, and more people were happy.

If Windows 8 was touch first, then 8.1 Update is most definitely keyboard/mouse first. Almost every single feature added in the Update is geared towards making the Desktop environment a first class citizen again, and it’s wonderful – and I say that as someone who uses and enjoys Windows 8 and 8.1 every day.

Traditional PCs – desktops and laptops – will now boot to the desktop by default. PC makers building tablets or types of hybrid machines with touchscreens can now set a flag to identify the device as a Slate, which will make them boot to the Start Screen. The Modern interface is now aware of how it’s being used. If you are using touch, it acts just like 8.1, but if you are using a keyboard and mouse, there are now context boxes on the right click menus. Moving the mouse to the top of the screen reveals the traditional minimize and close options. The task bar is now available on the Start Screen. Hidden functions like Search and the Power button are now available right on the Start Screen by your login ID.

And speaking of the task bar, as in interim step until further Desktop/Modern integration happens is the ability to pin Modern apps to the taskbar. They still open the full screen or snapped Modern app, but it’s an easy way to multitask with desktop and modern apps. Microsoft also demonstrated further integration coming in a future update. Whether that is an 8.1 Update 2 or Windows 9 wasn’t specified, but it brings Modern apps to the desktop in a window. I think this will really increase the usefulness of Modern apps. Full screen on a 10” tablet is fine, but when a desktop is equipped with 22” to 32” monitors, there’s a LOT of wasted real estate by running these apps in full screen, or even split screen mode. This is a huge change from the original vision of Windows 8, and if anything can make Modern apps more useful, this is it.

Also with apps, one of the biggest issues with Windows 8 was that any app you installed dumped at least one tile onto the Start Screen. For Modern apps, this was mostly useful, since the tiles were usually live, but with desktop apps like Office, you could easily get 10-20 new tiles on your Start Screen which was a huge pain. So for Windows 8.1, they removed the auto-created tile on the Start Screen, and put it on the All Apps screen. This solved one issue, but certainly created a new one because once you installed an app, you had no idea where it was. For 8.1 Update, they are adding a text notification at the bottom of the screen to let you know that you’ve got new apps there waiting to be used. I think this is an improvement, but the obvious solution is to add an option in the store to pin the app to the start screen automatically.

And the final piece with the app situation is Universal Apps. At long last, common code can be used to develop for phones, tablets, laptops, and desktops. Visual Studio will now build one application, which can have both Windows 8/RT and Windows Phone binaries. This also enables the store to allow one app purchase to be installed on both platforms without having to re-purchase the app as you do now. The keynote demonstration was the Modern version of Office, coded to WinRT, and running on both the desktop and phone with the same code base. Even better, with the update developers can now target Desktop apps (due to the windowed mode), Tablet apps, Phone apps, and even Xbox One apps, all with common code. This is a big win for developers, and I’m sure Microsoft is hoping it draws more developers to WinRT, which in turn will be a big win for consumers.

Another notable change to Windows 8.1 Update is a new build which enables Windows on low end PCs. Windows has been shrunk, and the memory usage has been reduced, enabling the installation of Windows on devices with 1 GB of RAM, and 16 GB of storage. Previous to this, it’s been difficult for hardware partners to be price competitive with Chrome OS devices and Android tablets because the Bill of Materials would be higher. This is coupled with a new licensing change, where Windows (Windows x86, RT, and Windows Phone) is now available free to OEMs for all devices with a screen size of less than 9”. Although I would never buy a tablet with 16 GB of storage, Microsoft should now be able to be price competitive with Android and Chromebooks.

There are also some additional features for Businesses. Mobile Device Management (MDM) is now extended, and IE 11 now has a compatibility mode which can be enabled for intranet sites which require IE 8 functionality. This feature alone should allow companies that were stuck on XP a new way to get off of the aging OS, assuming they are not stuck with web apps that require IE 6 or lower.

This was an interesting keynote. Windows 8 was all about touch, and this keynote was all about restoring functionality to Windows that people have grown accustomed to over the years. The demos of both Modern apps running in a window with a start menu, and Office as a universal app were certainly a clear indication that the Steven Sinofsky days are over. Windows is changing again. No longer will it be “touch first” but instead be any input method you prefer. And I don’t mean to imply that they are taking away any touch functionality either – both are now equally supported which is how it needs to be.

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • grahaman27 - Thursday, April 3, 2014 - link

    I used windows 8 which was then updated to windows 8.1, but I switched back to windows 7 because I got tired of minor incompatibilities and inconsistencies (notibly chrome, Google drive did not work right). I also hated the fact that windows 8 requires secure boot and that the "F8" startup menu is gone. I did use classic shell, so I don't think 8.1 fixes anything for me besides the start menu which I already had.

    So, I guess I will just wait for windows 9.
  • Wolfpup - Thursday, April 3, 2014 - link

    Chrome works just fine for me, and I used Google Drive briefly and it seemed fine.

    Also Windows 8 does NOT require secure boot. That's an option.
  • grahaman27 - Friday, April 4, 2014 - link

    its an "option" but it will nag you every time you reboot and puts a watermark in the bottom right hand corner of your desktop just like having a non-genuine version of windows would. and google drive worked for me once I put it in compatibility mode. but there are just too many issues for me. I want a desktop that works.
  • Dribble - Thursday, April 3, 2014 - link

    Hurray!!! by 9.0 it might work almost as well as 7....
  • azazel1024 - Thursday, April 3, 2014 - link

    I hadn't read about the compatibility mode being added for IE11. Hopefully it works properly and if so, that would be a nice little perk. My wife's part time job she has to enter her time sheets through an employee portal and it ONLY works with IE8-10. No 11 support (fails to load) and it won't work with any version of Chrome or Firefox I've tried, even the ones it claims it supports. So I've been running an IE compatibility dev app to run IE9 java engine so that she can still enter her hours (doesn't work from mobile safari either).

    Otherwise we have zero devices that can log her in. iPad 2 and iPhones don't work. My kids Android tabs don't work. My laptop, desktop and server (8.1, 8.1 and 8) all have IE11 on them and won't work. So its that dev app or nothing right now.

    This would be nice so any of the IE11 machines could finally work.
  • Da W - Thursday, April 3, 2014 - link

    Depends on your ecosystem.
    I use a surface pro and windows phone, so my big rig in the basement having Windows 8.1 helps, if only for skydrive and apps sync. Having your music, playlist and pictures all synced effortlessly to all machines is cool. Even with android i have to manually perform some action to sync everything with my PC. With windows 7 i would have to download extra software to do the same.

    Some things like Skype or even printing/scaning is easier for computer illetrate with the apps versions (instead of bloated dekstop software version).

    Although i do use Metro on my surface and desktop only on my gaming rig.
  • jardows2 - Thursday, April 3, 2014 - link

    This update makes me wish I had went ahead and bought Windows 8 for my new build a couple years ago. After testing Windows 8 on an older laptop, and taking some time to tweak the interface to my liking, I find it a much smoother experience for my purposes.

    Also, I don't get the complaining about the "look" of Windows 8. The first thing I have done with Windows XP and later is turn off all the eye candy. Shoot, I'd still be using DOS command line if I could still function with modern computing that way.
  • piroroadkill - Thursday, April 3, 2014 - link

    That's it, you don't get the complaining because you don't care how it looks.

    You answered your own question.

    Some people do care, and they think 8 is ugly. Not hard to understand.
  • jardows2 - Thursday, April 3, 2014 - link

    I still don't understand the fuss. When I am working on my computer, I am not looking at the window borders or the taskbar, I am focused on the content on my screen. When I am gaming, I almost always use full screen mode, but if not, the above statement applies. I personally find that all MS Windows default themes are rather ugly. You may not like the look, but to make such a big fuss over it when it is such a small part of the experience, to me is just people wanting to whine.
  • Deelron - Friday, April 4, 2014 - link

    For me it's like I'm watching TV and there's hideous shiny bezel around the screen reflecting light that's coming from outside. Even though I'm not "looking" at the bezel I still notice it's hideousness nevertheless. When I go to write something I'd prefer to be in a nice garden area rather then surrounded by a garage full of tools. Aesthetics most definitely matter.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now