ASUS N10JC: the Netbook Goes Corporate
by Jarred Walton on December 24, 2008 4:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Laptops
Performance Evaluation
We're not going to run through an extensive suite of software testing on the N10JC, as you should already know that it aims to be fast enough to be useful rather than to set any performance records. Any CPU intensive tasks are going to struggle, but normal office work and internet surfing posed no serious problem. As this is a Windows XP laptop, we do have to omit testing with PCMark Vantage and 3DMark Vantage, but we did run the older versions along with a couple other tests. Here are the results, with comparisons to other recently tested notebooks. (Sorry -- other than battery life testing on the original ASUS Eee PC, we don't have any comparison points with other networks.)
Starting with PCMark, we immediately see that overall performance is going to be quite a bit lower than modern laptops. That's the case with pretty much all of the current netbooks, but you should know going in that you are looking at performance roughly equal to a decent laptop from three years ago.
One interesting point is that the Hyper-Threading present in the Intel Atom chip appears to help a lot more than in other implementations, increasing overall performance by 53% over single threaded rendering. That still can't compete with the 80%+ improvements seen on Core 2 Duo systems, but the in-order Adam core definitely benefits more from SMT than traditional out-of-order architectures.
Overall, performance in CPU intensive tasks is very poor compared to any modern system; obviously, you shouldn't plan to run these tasks on a netbook unless you are very patient. In less strenuous applications, the CPU may not be as much of a bottleneck -- for example, office applications and web surfing were fast enough that we didn't have any serious complaints. Still, it's important to have appropriate expectations.
So if raw performance isn't one of the critical factors, what is? We would certainly rate battery life near the top of the list, so let's look at that next.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
45 Comments
View All Comments
ATWindsor - Wednesday, December 24, 2008 - link
Please continue to test the displays of laptops. This is very good information, and often not tested by other sites.Clauzii - Wednesday, December 24, 2008 - link
I'd like to see the ASUS with the Mac battery. That should bring a whole day of interrupted usage to the table. Besdides that, I think I'd prefer a dual core Atom and no discrete GPU, since the dualcore Atoms CAN decode movies well.Oh, and a Merry Christmas from Denmark :)
JarredWalton - Wednesday, December 24, 2008 - link
Glaedelige jul til dig ogsaa! I don't think dual-core Atom would do all that well with H.264 1080P, but it might manage. I suppose the real question is whether it would be more power efficient than the 9300M or not. No one seems to be doing Atom dual-core laptops yet (though I'm sure they're out there -- just no one has offered to send one for review). As for the Mac batteries, they're actually *smaller* than the ASUS battery in terms of capacity; OS X just seems to do better at optimizing for power as far as I can tell.therealnickdanger - Wednesday, December 24, 2008 - link
But would you be kind enough to maybe test a couple old games like Half-Life 2, Counter-Strike Source, Halo, WoW, UT2004? Merry Christmas, AT!JarredWalton - Wednesday, December 24, 2008 - link
Given the performance in UT3 and CoH, I'd expect pretty reasonable frame rates in the games you mention - maybe not at high detail, but medium shouldn't be a problem. Let me see if I can dig out HL2 and give it a run for old time's sake....therealnickdanger - Wednesday, December 24, 2008 - link
Fair enough. Thanks for considering it! ;-)Penti - Wednesday, December 24, 2008 - link
A XP Home laptop is not a business version, why not test the Vista Business version? Would be more interesting to see how the VB N10J-A2 fair.A VB laptop with XP Pro downgrade rights is the only thing fitting into the corporate world. What your reviewing is still a consumer laptop. With just 1GB of ram to add on top of that. Certainly the 800 dollars N10J-A2 would be more difficult to justify. And only then you can talk corporate.
ltcommanderdata - Wednesday, December 24, 2008 - link
I thought the XP Home thing was mandated by Microsoft for netbooks. As in Microsoft will only continue selling XP in it's Home form for netbooks which only have 1GB of RAM. ASUS can't put XP Pro in since it's no longer directly available and I would guess using Vista Business by default would increase the price and of course reduce performance.strikeback03 - Wednesday, December 24, 2008 - link
As of September, our campus computer store was still selling licenses for XP Pro to use with our Volume License media.I haven't needed one since then, but businesses with volume licenses can probably upgrade if needed.ltcommanderdata - Wednesday, December 24, 2008 - link
That's kind of different. XP is still available for smaller OEMs, but I'm pretty sure that XP isn't available for big name companies like ASUS anymore unless they stick with the netbook restrictions.