Dell Inspiron 2200

Since originally ordering and receiving the Dell Inspiron 2200, Dell has introduced a new line of Inspiron notebooks for the home.  The Inspiron B130 is Dell's latest competitor in the sub-$600 market; however, its release was not in time to be included in this roundup. We chose to keep the Inspiron 2200 in this review as it is still available for Higher Education customers, but we will be working to bring an updated roundup with the Inspiron B130 as soon as possible. 

The Inspiron 2200 that we received came with a Celeron M 370 (1.5GHz) processor based around Intel's 915GM chipset; naturally, it uses the chipset's integrated graphics.  The Inspiron B130, the 2200's replacement, moves back down to a Celeron 360 (1.4GHz) as its default processor option.  

Like all of the notebooks here today, the Inspiron 2200 that we configured only shipped with 256MB of RAM, to keep within our $600 budget.  Storage comes courtesy of a single 40GB Fujitsu MHV2040AH drive. 

Unfortunately, in order to meet the $600 budget, the Inspiron 2200 comes with no wireless networking options.

Dell Inspiron 2200
CPU Intel Celeron M 370
(1.5GHz/1MB L2/400MHz FSB)
Chipset Intel 915GM
Memory 256MB DDR333 (1 DIMM)
GPU Integrated Intel Extreme Graphics
Display 14.1" XGA (1024 x 768)
HDD 40GB Fujitsu MHV2040AH
Optical Storage 24X CD-RW/DVD-ROM Drive
Wireless N/A
Ethernet Intel PRO/100 VE 10/100
Modem Internal Soft 56K
Audio SigmaTel C-Major
Ports Headphone, microphone, PC Card slot, 3 x USB 2.0, Ethernet, Modem, VGA out
Mouse Trackpad
Size (L x W x H) 13.0" x 10.6" x 1.46"
Weight 5.99 lbs
Battery 8-Cell NiMH
OS and Other Software Windows XP Home SP2
Price as Configured $599.00
Warranty 90 days

Surprisingly enough, there are no ports at the front of the notebook:

On the right side, you once again have no ports, just the built-in CD-RW/DVD-ROM drive:

And here's what you have on the left side:

- Headphone jack
- Microphone jack
- PC Card slot

The reason for the relatively barren front and sides of the Inspiron is the fact that Dell has put all of the external interface ports on the back of the unit.  Turning the Inspiron 2200 around reveals:

- 3 USB 2.0 Ports
- Ethernet jack
- Modem jack
- VGA output

Given the popularity of USB drives and other USB devices that you are constantly plugging in and removing from your system, we find that keeping the USB ports at the rear of the machine is a mistake.  Just during the writing of this article, transferring drivers onto the newly formatted notebooks meant that we had to reach around to the back of the unit to plug in our USB drive.  It is much easier if the USB ports (or at least one of them) is located at either side of the notebook, which is what Gateway and Compaq opted to do instead. 

Compaq Usability Dell Build Quality and Aesthetics
Comments Locked

50 Comments

View All Comments

  • OrSin - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    No video benchmarks at all. I'm not saying test BF2, but something would be nice.
    I think the AMD laptops would show some definate leads in that.
  • raskren - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    It sounds like you want to see a benchmark where the AMD offerings *might* show an advantage over Intel so you can feel better about *your* company.

    These are not for gaming. Why should Anand waste his time?

    Why don't we do some Geo Metro top speed testing as well?
  • hondaman - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    Has nothing to do with amd vs intel.

    Has everything to do with how well laptops do compared to desktops in games.
  • hondaman - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    I was dissappointed about this too. It was the first thing i looked for when I read this article today on anandtech. I wanted some game benchmarks.

    Anyone who buys a 600.00 laptop isnt buying it for games, however, I _am_ in the market for a laptop in the 1000.00 range, and I would like to do some casual gaming here and there on it. Severeral of these laptops reviewed share the same video processor as some laptops much more expensive, and good laptop reviews are so hard to come by.
  • Hacp - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    Bottom line, gaming on integrated graphics is non existant. If you want a gaming laptop, get dedicated graphics.
  • PrinceGaz - Wednesday, November 30, 2005 - link

    Gaming does not necessarily mean playing the very latest games, and at the highest graphics quality settings. Some people seem to think all that matters with a game is how pretty the graphics are, and discard it when something that looks better comes along. Gameplay is more important to me, and there are plenty of older games that are just as much fun to play as the current hits.

    I'm sure all of these $600 laptops with their integrated graphics (especially ATI) would be quite capable of playing the top games of the 2001-2002 era very well, and do a decent job with some later titles as well. The only likely probloem is the 256MB system memory which has to be shared with graphics-- but an upgrade to 512MB is the first thing most people would do to these laptops anyway to make them more flexible.
  • mikecel79 - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    Why? Who is going to try and game on one of these things?
  • oupei - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    maybe some RTS games or something would have been nice.
  • Hacp - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    Gaming would be horrible. WHo would wnat to play halflife 2 at 800x600 at 24 frames per second?

    I have a V2000Z and tried playing some games on it. It sucks. About the only "modern" game that I can play is Civ VI.

    I'm pretty sure that older games will run fine on it though.
  • bjacobson - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    Do you have the x300 ATi or the Intel graphics? I'm thinking of getting one of these boards too.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now