Conclusion

With drives like the Inland Performance Plus, Phison's E18 controller has kept them in competition for the consumer SSD performance crown. The Inland Performance Plus is an extremely fast drive that sets a few new performance records, but more often it ends up tied or slightly slower than a competing PCIe 4.0 flagship SSD. The difference between this drive and other top PCIe 4.0 drives like the WD Black SN850 would not be noticeable during real-world usage, so the question of which one is fastest is more about bragging rights than tangible benefits.

Phison is the only company already on their second generation of PCIe 4.0 controllers, but they still have some room for improvement. The Inland Performance Plus consistently had high power consumption and poor efficiency during our testing. It's not completely out of line for a high-end drive that needs to prioritize performance over power efficiency, but the bar is being raised by the in-house controllers from several of the major NAND manufacturers. A second round of Phison E18-based products will be coming to market soon using Micron's 176L TLC rather than the current 96L TLC, and that should enable slightly improved performance and power efficiency. It might be enough to bump the new E18 drives into first place on more performance tests, and will definitely help keep this market segment highly competitive.

Our most difficult (and least realistic) tests revealed that the Inland Performance Plus and the Phison E18 controller and firmware also have some difficulties with performance consistency, for random read latency and for write performance where the SLC caching behavior occasionally leaves something to be desired. These aren't serious performance problems, but they are blemishes that we would prefer not to have on top-tier products. Firmware improvements may be able to help these issues, but a lot of the brands selling Phison drives aren't very good about making firmware updates available to end users.

PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD Prices
May 13, 2021
  480-512 GB 960 GB-1 TB 2 TB
Inland Performance Plus
Phison E18
  $189.99 (19¢/GB) $379.99 (19¢/GB)
Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus
Phison E18
  $199.98 (20¢/GB) $449.15 (22¢/GB)
Mushkin GAMMA
Phison E18
  $259.99 (26¢/GB) $499.99 (25¢/GB)
ADATA XPG Gammix S70
Innogrit IG5236
  $179.99 (18¢/GB) $349.99 (17¢/GB)
Samsung 980 PRO
Samsung Elpis
$119.99 (24¢/GB) $199.99 (20¢/GB) $399.99 (20¢/GB)
Sabrent Rocket 4.0
Phison E16
$89.98 (18¢/GB) $159.98 (16¢/GB) $399.99 (20¢/GB)
WD Black SN850
WD G2
$128.74 (26¢/GB) $199.99 (20¢/GB) $399.99 (20¢/GB)
ADATA XPG Gammix S50 Lite
SM2267 (4ch)
  $139.99 (14¢/GB) $259.99 (13¢/GB)
PCIe 3.0 SSDs:
SK hynix Gold P31 $74.99 (15¢/GB) $134.99 (13¢/GB)  
Samsung 970 EVO Plus $89.99 (18¢/GB) $159.90 (16¢/GB) $299.99 (15¢/GB)
WD Black SN750 $69.99 (14¢/GB) $129.99 (13¢/GB) $309.99 (15¢/GB)

Micro Center's in store only pricing for the Inland Performance Plus makes it the cheapest Phison E18 drive on the market, though Sabrent's more widely available Rocket 4 Plus is only $10 more for the 1TB model. With the exception of the Inland, most of the E18 drives seem to be priced at or above where the other second-wave PCIe 4.0 flagships are. The cheapest of the new PCIe 4.0 flagships is ADATA's Gammix S70 using Innogrit's controller. The older Phison E16 drives with TLC NAND are starting to get harder to find, but some such as the Sabrent Rocket 4.0 are a good mid-point between the latest top of the line drives and mainstream PCIe 3.0 drives.

For consumers with access to Micro Center's in-store pricing, the Inland Performance Plus is a reasonable choice since it's a bit cheaper than the flagships from Samsung and WD—but keep in mind that Micro Center is only offering a three year warranty rather than the usual five. For everyone else who has to deal with the online prices on other brands' Phison E18 drives, going for the WD Black SN850 instead makes more sense, especially for the 2TB models. The WD Black has more consistent performance and substantially less heat output.

However, all of the high-end PCIe 4.0 drives still carry a very steep price premium over even the best PCIe 3.0 drives. Recent increases in retail SSD prices have affected mainstream models more than the premium PCIe 4.0 drives, but the price gap is going to remain pretty wide. Those more mainstream models still provide almost as much real-world performance and a wider range of capacity options. Until a more compelling use case for PCIe 4.0 performance shows up, saving $50-100 by sticking with PCIe 3.0 storage seems like a great way to deal with high prices on other PC components.

Mixed IO Performance and Idle Power Management
Comments Locked

118 Comments

View All Comments

  • Billy Tallis - Thursday, May 13, 2021 - link

    Single-core performance can help with a lot of synthetic storage benchmarks, by making for faster context switches and system calls. But if you care about such marginal improvements, I suspect we would find that dropping Windows and using Linux instead will have a far greater impact on storage performance and OS overhead.

    I don't recall any of the PCIe 4.0 SSD controller vendors complaining about AMD's PCIe implementation being a bottleneck.
  • mode_13h - Thursday, May 13, 2021 - link

    @thestryker is right that Intel claimed faster PCIe 4 SSD performance than the competition, in one of their Rocket Lake slides. I think it was like 20%, but now I can't find the slide.

    I was so struck by it that I clearly remember it, and was wondering if they were talking about a PCIe 4.0 drive connected to Ryzen via its chipset link. Because that's the only way it made sense to me.
  • GeoffreyA - Friday, May 14, 2021 - link

    "connected to Ryzen via its chipset link"

    That's a possibility.
  • Spunjji - Friday, May 14, 2021 - link

    Ryan Shrout released the information in February, and it was 11%. The claim was based on performance from the PCMark 10's "quick" storage benchmark. Apparently the drives being tested were connected to a riser card in a secondary PCIe slot, which was an odd decision as X570 supports connecting the SSD directly to the CPU via the M.2 slots.

    It looks like they found a benchmark that favoured their setup specifically and went with it.
  • Slash3 - Friday, May 14, 2021 - link

    Rocket Lake itself also has a dedicated CPU connected NVMe M.2 slot. The whole setup was just absurd.
  • carcakes - Thursday, May 13, 2021 - link

    Experience the Best of Both Worlds: 8x M.2 Ports @ x16 PCIe 4.0 Speed!

    1x HighPoint SSD7540 PCIe Gen4 x16 8-Port M.2 NVMe RAID Controller + 8x ASRock Legacy M.2 Graphics Card.
  • mode_13h - Thursday, May 13, 2021 - link

    That's more expensive, chews up PCIe lanes, and can only hurt read latency. Plus, having faster SSDs to put in a RAID makes such configurations even faster!
  • Dug - Thursday, May 13, 2021 - link

    So what you are really saying is, buy the WD SN850 instead of this.
  • Oxford Guy - Friday, May 14, 2021 - link

    Looks like the ADATA is the price-performance winner for budget buyers.
  • Alexvrb - Thursday, May 13, 2021 - link

    When the 176L-equipped models with tuned firmware roll around, they just might take the crown.

    Then again, until hardware-accelerated DirectStorage titles start coming out, I don't think there's much benefit for me. Even then, only for titles that have some extremely large assets that need to be streamed in and don't fit in RAM... DS is far more beneficial for consoles since they need to save money wherever possible - mainly RAM.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now