ATI is just as guilty as NVIDIA as far as high priced cards go.  The 9800XT provides a slightly better overall non-overclocked experience than the GeForceFX 5950s, but is it really worth $400+? 

ATI's tried and true Radeon 9700 Pro and 9800 Pro continue to be our high end choices.  The 9700 Pro continues to shine even against the best NVIDIA and ATI have to offer.  For around $200, we like the 9700 Pro just as much as the GeForceFX 5900. 

On a more value oriented rig, it gets a little more complicated.  NVIDIA's 5600 line seems a little underpowered and overpriced compared to the older Radeon 9600 Pro/XT.  At publication the Sapphire 9600XT packs some decent performance at around $150, without totally sacrificing performance.  For the price, it's the best card you can buy.

However, consider one quick side note when buying a video card with those tax returns.  Upcoming Intel and SiS chipsets anticipate completely eliminating the AGP bus in favor of PCI-Express.  Essentially, if you purchase a video card today and hope to buy a Socket 775 Prescott and Motherboard in a couple months, you will have to pawn that wicked Radeon or GeForceFX.  It appears as if VIA's PT890 core will support AGP and PCIe, but whether or not the performance will match SiS and Intel's solutions has yet to be decided.  Our final advice? Don't buy a video card now unless you anticipate keeping your rig for a long, long time.

NVIDIA Video Cards
Comments Locked

20 Comments

View All Comments

  • TrogdorJW - Wednesday, February 11, 2004 - link

    #9, from what I've heard, yes, you will gain a speed boost. However, given that you already have 1 GB of RAM, presumably running at something like 3-4-4-8 timings if it was "value" RAM, you would be scrapping your current memory and paying roughly $320 for 1 GB of Mushkin Black. Unless you're the type that has to have the best of everything, I would stick with what you currently have.

    It also depends on your CPU. If you're using P4, an overclock of 10% will easily wipe out the speed advantage of lower latency RAM. Even a 5% OC would probably do the trick. This should be trivial to do on a P4 system. With Athlon 64, the same is probably true, but my one experience with a 3000+ was that the system was *much* more finicky about the RAM. So if you're looking at Athlon 64, I would get at least the Mushkin Purple.
  • XPgeek - Tuesday, February 10, 2004 - link

    Kristopher, is it better to get a higher grade of PC3200 vs, like, Kingston ValuRAM? i currently have 2 512MB sticks of the KVR400X64C3/512 in my system. would i gain anything by getting something like Mushkin Black?
  • eBauer - Tuesday, February 10, 2004 - link

    Although you must take into account, you're comparing a $200 RETAIL 9700 Pro to a $219 OEM/BULK 9800 Pro... The 3 year warranty is nice. Retail 9800 Pro's are going for much higher...
  • KristopherKubicki - Tuesday, February 10, 2004 - link

    Interesting point Rekonn,

    The problem becomes if each card is "only" $20 difference from the other, you continually keep saying that. A 9600 Pro is only $20 more than a 9600. A 9600XT is only $20 more than a 9600 Pro. A 9700 non pro is only $20 more than a 9600 XT, etc etc.

    I agree its a difficult choice ebtween the two cards. I would say use your best judgement. In a couple weeks i would hope the 9800 pro is under $200 which would easily make it my #1 choice.

    Kristopher
  • Rekonn - Tuesday, February 10, 2004 - link

    Why is the 9700 Pro for $200 recommended, when you can get the Sapphire 9800 Pro for $219 ?
  • KristopherKubicki - Tuesday, February 10, 2004 - link

    Tiorapatea: Vendors claim there will be no premium on PCI-E cards over AGP. Still you ahve to upgrade though. I have not heard anything about a AGP to PCI-E bridge or PCI-E to AGP bridge.

    0.0 I dont think we will see too many future VIA boards. KT890 looks to be the end of the line for them.

    2.2 For whatever reason someone decided it was a good idea to implement nForce3 250 on Socket 754 and on Socket 939 so we will see another revision of the 754 boards. I think its kind of pointless because the AMD roadmaps dont show speeds on the 754 past 3700+. The roadmaps have been wrong before though so dont put too much faith in them.

    4.0 I would not assume this is true either. The PT890 chipset *can* support AGP, but that still doesnt mean vendors will put 2 separate buses on there. PT890 will probably be a budget chipset anyway, it really looks uncompetitive. Particularly, the first round of southbridges to launch with PT890 are fairly weak compared to SiS and Intel's solutions.

    Kristopher


  • ripdude - Tuesday, February 10, 2004 - link

    Thanks number 2 and 3.
    I'm going to wait for the new sockets, being a student my budget decides.
    Unless the new sockets are very expensive I'll go for the 939.
  • Tiorapatea - Tuesday, February 10, 2004 - link

    AGP will live on for a while. Nvidia has developed a PCI Express to AGP bridge, which effectively means it can produce one set of card designs and offer them to owners of both AGP and PCI Express motherboards. ATI has not done this so one may speculate that it may not offer its newest designs for the AGP slot for quite so long as Nvidia.

    What is muddying the waters right now is that chipset vendors seem to have decided that the current and forthcoming processors from AMD and Intel will not all be offered motherboard designs that provide a choice between PCI Express and AGP for the graphics interconnect.

    Therefore, upgraders are faced with interdependent choices - your CPU choice will affect not only your highest likely CPU upgrade for a given motherboard but also your highest likely graphics card upgrade.

    Thus, at this point, it seems as if:

    0.0 Socket A AthlonXP CPUs look like they will be confined to motherboards that offer only an AGP slot. (Note, however, that PCI Express 1x slots for peripherals may be offered, for example if VIA decides to implement VT8251 in an AthlonXP chipset.)
    0.1 Athlon XP has likely reached its highest speed grade (buy a 2500+ and overclock).
    0.2 Still a great buy for many people but I won't go into that.

    1.0 Pentium 4 on Socket 478 will get PCI Express chipsets from all chipset vendors.
    1.1 LGA 775, a new socket out in April, will bring an end to official speed grade increases on Socket 478. Prescott 3.6 GHz will be last Intel release for Socket 478.
    1.2 It may or may not have reached its practical highest speed grade (buy a 2.4C/2.6C/2.8C and overclock to around 3.4-3.6?). Prescott on Socket 478 may well go higher but it remains to be seen whether this can be done with a reasonably economical and reliable cooling system.
    1.3 More expensive than AthlonXP, especially after motherboard costs but does perform better in many applications.

    2.0 Athlon64 will bo offered a choice of AGP or PCI express motherboards.
    2.1 Socket 754 may not have a very long life. Official roadmap goes as far as 3700+ (from today's 3000+ to 3400+) but AMD may offer more when it moves to a 90nm process from Q4 '04.
    2.2 Many people are waiting for Nvidia to release its nforce 250 chipset before going for this platform. Many are also waiting for Socket 939, which may offer higher performance and a longer life. Still others are waiting for Microsoft to release its 64 bit port of WindowsXP.
    2.3 Overall, Athlon64 is a very promising CPU.

    3.0 Athlon64 on Socket 939 is scheduled for launch on 29th March '04 at a 3700+ rating. Socket 939 will add dual channel memory support for the Athlon64.
    3.1 Socket 939 motherboards will offer either a PCI Express slot or an AGP slot for graphics cards.
    3.2 This socket will likely have a longer life than Socket 754.
    3.3 I expect Socket 939 platforms to sell at a significant premium to Socket 754 for some time, partly because of the high initial speed grade of the CPU at launch relative to existing Athlon64 CPUs, which start at 3000+.

    4.0 Pentium 4E (Prescott) on socket LGA775 should be out in April. Neither Intel nor SIS will offer chipsets that support an AGP slot. VIA will offer a choice between PCI Express and AGP.
    4.1 I would expect this platform to launch with a 3.6 GHz CPU.
    4.2 It is currently unclear how this processor will scale but, subject to better control of its thermal characteristics, one might speculate that 4 GHz could be achieved by the end of this year (I am bit sceptical).
    4.3 If the heat dissipation of Prescott proves to be a problem, you might need a new case, a new power supply and a new motherboard if you ever want to upgrade your CPU.

    What would I do?
    I have no idea because I don't know what you want to do on your system. That is something you need to clear up before you spend any money.
    My attitude is that, in general, we'd all be better off running slightly older hardware and concentrating on supporting Free Software.
  • sipc660 - Tuesday, February 10, 2004 - link

    my advice to no #1 is to wait for pci-e anyway and than buy a fast good quality agp card which will be cheaper and serve those 2-3 years.

    in three years we'll have developed PCI express - 2 fully
    (which i am working on now)

    and 128 bit computing ;)
  • ripdude - Tuesday, February 10, 2004 - link

    Neat row once again, I wonder if its usefull to wait for the PCI-express cards.
    My upgrade cycle isn't that quick (once every 2-3 years).

    The next generation pc-stuff (about may I believe) with socket 939, LGA775, PCI-express etc will be expensive. Will it be usefull for a once-in-a-while upgrader to wait for the next generation, or will AGP live on for a year or so?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now