Voodoo Envy M:855 - Hexing up a Storm

Intuitively, it may appear to be odd that a seemingly obscure system vendor would be the first to showcase production samples of new technology, particularly when it comes to processors. However, the reason that Voodoo is able to do so is because of their small company size (in comparison to the big three: IBM, Dell, and HP/Compaq). As we mentioned before, when it concerns mobile technology, technology that is pertinent usually pops up about a quarter or so after the desktop market receives it. This is the case with the Pentium 4 and the Pentium 4-M, Athlon XP and Athlon XP-M, and so forth...

The reason that we don’t see the big three hitting the market with Athlon 64 notebooks now is exactly due to the reason they are big. This large market share ends up translating into more time spent qualifying any upcoming products (and to more stringent requirements), as well as all the bureaucracy accompany a large corporation. This extremely thorough process is explicitly in place because no large company wants to be the first to take that possibly fatal risk. Their reputation, customer loyalty, product perception, etc… are all up for grabs in a sense. All of this is just extenuated when it comes to the mobile side, as people tend to be more fickle in when it comes to how much money will be spent for what on the most part will be a non-user serviceable/upgradeable system.

On the other side, smaller companies have less bureaucracy to run through the mills, and at that same time, they have a less stringent qualification process. These companies, after all, are often built towards the fringe markets, and their reputation, which goes hand in hand, is centered on bringing forth the cutting edge.

For those unfamiliar with Voodoo, they are a Canadian based company that recently has been generating more press than their biggest competitor (Alienware), due to a slew of interesting products of late. It is interesting to note that Voodoo was the first system vendor to use a 7200RPM hard drive in a widely available notebook (the M:355). Their current mobile line is completely of ATI design, which isn’t a bad time to be, and when we heard about the M:855 a while back, this definitely caught our eyes. Equipped with an Athlon 64 desktop replacement processor and Mobility Radeon 9600 Pro, this is a desktop replacement of a variety in current short supply.

The New Voodoo Envy M:855

Click to enlarge.

As time as passed since the Athlon 64 official debut, we are now at the tips of the iceberg concerning Athlon 64 for notebooks (different from the mobile version of Athlon 64).

Index Athlon 64 for notebooks - Not Quite Desktop, Not Quite Mobile
Comments Locked

24 Comments

View All Comments

  • Shalmanese - Wednesday, November 5, 2003 - link

    Well, seeing as this is the first 9600 based production notebook they have in the lab in the moment, its kinda hard to bench it against any others. WHEN they review the Sager, I'm sure they will have the Voodoo benchie in there.
  • ssamurai26 - Wednesday, November 5, 2003 - link

    Ok, who makes the closest notebook to the Voodoo then?
  • Locutus4657 - Wednesday, November 5, 2003 - link

    No offence.... But why didn't you compare the preformance of this notebook v. several other notebooks when it came to game preformance... I'm more than a little dissapointed to see yet another ATI/nVidia comparison in what should be a comparison of finished notebook products.
  • KristopherKubicki - Wednesday, November 5, 2003 - link

    #7: AnandTech doesnt get paid to do reviews. What a troll. Did you even notice Andrew wrote this review and not Anand? I'm writing this on a Sager by the way.

    Kristopher
  • petz - Wednesday, November 5, 2003 - link

    "Up to par" with DELL's best? Is that what you call 50 to 100% higiher FPS on every benchmark?
  • Madcat207 - Wednesday, November 5, 2003 - link

    In NO way is AW the closest.

    Unless your taking about the deepest pockets......
  • ssamurai26 - Wednesday, November 5, 2003 - link

    Yes, would have been nice to see some competition in there. It was interesting none the less, but it even says in the review that the closest competitor is Alienware. And Alienware has both fx5600go and M10 in their machines.
  • Madcat207 - Wednesday, November 5, 2003 - link

    Andrew, that is fine, but it still doesnt explain why there was no comparable model tested. Was Anand not paid enough to test a Sager along with it?
  • Boonesmi - Tuesday, November 4, 2003 - link

    unlike some of the folks above, i liked the review... and im looking forward to part 2 (part 2 will have the info im more interested in)
  • Andrew Ku - Tuesday, November 4, 2003 - link

    There is a reason that this can still be called a 9600 Pro. First of all, the revelation of the requirements for the Pro name only came to light in the last 48 hours. Sager themselves wouldn't have known about this until recently.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now