Conclusion

With the Argon AR07 SilverStone is trying to entice a very specific type of system builder: power users that will be building large gaming systems or workstations but, at the same time, are on a limited budget. This is an interesting market intersection since it’s a group of builders who need better performance and aren’t afraid to spend money on it, but are looking for the “sweet spot” in parts’ performance and pricing, in order to get the best deal for their money. For many companies then this is a low-key but still very important market: if you can make a great product, you'll be watching it sell in high volumes for years to come.

In terms of quality, the Argon AR07 is a well-made product, without any significant imperfections. The unplated copper heatpipes may get oxidized over time, but that will not be causing any real damage to the cooler, only degrade its aesthetic value. Also, due to their unique design, the aluminum fins have many sharp edges and great care is required during the installation of the cooler. Other than these imperfections, the Argon AR07 is a mechanically solid product, with a good mounting mechanism and a firm fins array. However potential buyers should also note that the Argon AR07 is 163 mm tall, so it will require a fairly wide case to fit, a layout that not all budget-minded cases will be designed for.

But more importantly, the overall performance of the Argon AR07 is actually better than what we originally assumed before testing the cooler. Although it cannot compete with premium 140 mm tower cooler offerings directly – nor is it meant to – the AR07's thermal performance does come relatively close, especially with its fan running at higher speeds. At the same time, the $35 cooler is significantly cheaper than premium 140 mm offerings, making it a very appealing choice to users who need a good aftermarket cooler but at a more reasonable price. You do end up trading off a few °C (or dB(A)) in lost performance, but for budget builders this can lower the overall cost of the system, or more likely allow for investing more money on betters parts elsewhere.

Meanwhile when compared to the popular and similarly priced Cooler Master EVO 212 tower cooler, the size of the Argon AR07 offers it a substantial advantage in terms of thermal and acoustics performance. Whereas the EVO 212 is based around a 120 mm fan and its fin array is sized to match, the AR07 is a 140 mm design and benefits accordingly. With more surface area and more airflow it can achieve better results, but this does come at a roughly $5 premium, so it's not going to be quite an apples-to-apples scenario.

Ultimately, assuming that the system’s case is wide enough to fit the 163 mm tall cooler, the SilverStone's Argon AR07 is a reasonable choice for users who are trying to combine good overall performance with the lowest possible cost. The company has hit a good balance between build quality, performance, and price, making it very competitive with the best of the budget coolers, and an option worth taking a look at.

Thermal Resistance VS Sound Pressure Level
Comments Locked

32 Comments

View All Comments

  • Rocket321 - Tuesday, June 13, 2017 - link

    @tonyou - thanks!
  • Drumsticks - Friday, June 9, 2017 - link

    Great performance from Silverstone! Size permitting, it looks like this should displace the Hyper 212 as many default recommendations. Thanks for the review, as well.
  • alin - Friday, June 9, 2017 - link

    I would review the Arctic Freezer 13.
    Outstanding cheap cooler. I personaly use it to passive cool a i7 4790. Great. No throttling at all. Checked using intel own XTU.
  • marc1000 - Sunday, June 11, 2017 - link

    nice review and cooler. though I enjoy scythe products a lot, and for smaller case I can only think of Ninja Mini, being only 112mm tall it's the shortest tower cooler I have found.

    I got one used from ebay some 5 years ago and it's still rocking fine a OC i5 2500k to 4.0ghz. not the fastest overclock, neither the coolest temps ever, but on a small case where no other towers would fit, it is cool and silent enough. way better than any compact or standard cooler.

    based on other comments however, I got really interested in Arctive Freezer 13, with only 130mm size and what looks like a way better design. thanks Alin!
  • alchemist83 - Sunday, June 18, 2017 - link

    lol for real? is ugly, has clips and gets nosiy at temp.
  • Samus - Friday, June 9, 2017 - link

    Wow $35? This effectively knocks the EVO212 from the top of the budget list, then.
  • DominionSeraph - Thursday, June 15, 2017 - link

    EVO and the new and improved 212X can be found for $20-25. (X is $20 right now) Their greatness is that it provides all the performance the majority of people need (silent operation at stock or a mild overclock) for the least amount of money. There are several coolers that beat the 212's at the $35 level, but they never fall under $35 and it's not such a big difference that there's any reason for most people to pony up the extra cash.
    Stock fans are loud. The 212 isn't, which is so worth the $20. Above that is only for pushing overclocks.
  • Oxford Guy - Sunday, July 2, 2017 - link

    If someone can build a computer they can afford $10-15 more for a better cooler.
  • yannigr2 - Saturday, June 10, 2017 - link

    I wouldn't call it "budget" or "inexpensive" solution. The last few years, because of AIO watercooling solutions and their relatively high prices, manufacturers found an excuse to increase prices on their air cooling solutions. This cooler wouldn't cost more than 20-25$ a few years back. Coolers that you could buy for $15 a few years ago, now cost over $20.
  • alchemist83 - Sunday, June 18, 2017 - link

    $20? doubt it a bit. Infact I know thats ballz as its been my job to know prices for 15 years now.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now