The SilverStone Argon AR07 Cooler Review: Tower Cooling on a Budget
by E. Fylladitakis on June 9, 2017 9:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Cases/Cooling/PSUs
- SilverStone
- Cooler
Testing Results, Low Fan Speed
Switching things up a bit, let's next take a look at cooler performance with the AR07's fan taken down to 7 Volts.
Operating the fan SilverStone Argon AR07 near its lowest speed point changes virtually nothing in regard to the cooler’s ranking and competitiveness. The thermal performance of the Argon AR07 still is very good while the thermal load is low, comparable to that of much more expensive products, but its efficiency seems to decrease as the thermal load increases.
| Core Temperature, Constant Thermal Load (Low Fan Speed) |
Despite of the lower efficiency of the Argon AR07 when handling high thermal loads, its superiority in comparison with smaller and/or simpler products is now becoming apparent. SilverStone’s offering provides measurably greater performance than the smaller (and cheaper) Cooler Master EVO 212, as well as “advanced” stock CPU coolers, such as the AMD Wraith and the Intel BXTS15A.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
32 Comments
View All Comments
Rocket321 - Tuesday, June 13, 2017 - link
@tonyou - thanks!Drumsticks - Friday, June 9, 2017 - link
Great performance from Silverstone! Size permitting, it looks like this should displace the Hyper 212 as many default recommendations. Thanks for the review, as well.alin - Friday, June 9, 2017 - link
I would review the Arctic Freezer 13.Outstanding cheap cooler. I personaly use it to passive cool a i7 4790. Great. No throttling at all. Checked using intel own XTU.
marc1000 - Sunday, June 11, 2017 - link
nice review and cooler. though I enjoy scythe products a lot, and for smaller case I can only think of Ninja Mini, being only 112mm tall it's the shortest tower cooler I have found.I got one used from ebay some 5 years ago and it's still rocking fine a OC i5 2500k to 4.0ghz. not the fastest overclock, neither the coolest temps ever, but on a small case where no other towers would fit, it is cool and silent enough. way better than any compact or standard cooler.
based on other comments however, I got really interested in Arctive Freezer 13, with only 130mm size and what looks like a way better design. thanks Alin!
alchemist83 - Sunday, June 18, 2017 - link
lol for real? is ugly, has clips and gets nosiy at temp.Samus - Friday, June 9, 2017 - link
Wow $35? This effectively knocks the EVO212 from the top of the budget list, then.DominionSeraph - Thursday, June 15, 2017 - link
EVO and the new and improved 212X can be found for $20-25. (X is $20 right now) Their greatness is that it provides all the performance the majority of people need (silent operation at stock or a mild overclock) for the least amount of money. There are several coolers that beat the 212's at the $35 level, but they never fall under $35 and it's not such a big difference that there's any reason for most people to pony up the extra cash.Stock fans are loud. The 212 isn't, which is so worth the $20. Above that is only for pushing overclocks.
Oxford Guy - Sunday, July 2, 2017 - link
If someone can build a computer they can afford $10-15 more for a better cooler.yannigr2 - Saturday, June 10, 2017 - link
I wouldn't call it "budget" or "inexpensive" solution. The last few years, because of AIO watercooling solutions and their relatively high prices, manufacturers found an excuse to increase prices on their air cooling solutions. This cooler wouldn't cost more than 20-25$ a few years back. Coolers that you could buy for $15 a few years ago, now cost over $20.alchemist83 - Sunday, June 18, 2017 - link
$20? doubt it a bit. Infact I know thats ballz as its been my job to know prices for 15 years now.